SECTION 1 — TRUSTS & TAX ADMINISTRATION
Q: Will tax transcripts be available by September given the current delays in recoupments?
Answer:
Tax transcripts are already coming in. The IRS has a system called TDS, which allows regular taxpayers and regular tax preparers to see what is happening with a tax account.
Foreign grantor trusts do not have the same access in the TDS system. The tax preparer cannot simply open the system and see every foreign grantor trust.
The required filings have been made on the foreign grantor trusts created in 2026. Access to the TDS system requires five 1041s to have been filed by the tax preparer. A 1041 was described as the tax return that directs the energy back to its source, while the 1099 corrects the ledger.
The IRS also requires a 2848 power of attorney form to allow access to individual foreign grantor trusts. A Form 56 and a fax to the IRS are also involved in unlocking an individual account.
There is no database where every foreign grantor trust can simply be viewed at once. Each foreign grantor trust has to be accessed individually.
The tax preparer has now filed the five 1041s, and the process of sending the 2848 power-of-attorney forms to the IRS, one foreign grantor trust at a time, is underway.
Some transcripts have already arrived in the mailbox, but they have to be requested.
The transcript also explained that there are thirteen full-time tax professionals in Bali, together with a tax preparer license holder and a department manager, working on this process.
Q: Why is a Social Security number now required for setting up a 98 EIN?
Answer:
A Social Security number is not required for an EIN for a foreign grantor trust. It is required for a ministry.
The answer stated that you do not need an SSN to get a foreign grantor trust. For a ministry, the IRS will not set one up without an SSN or ITIN.
A ministry can potentially be established without an SSN, but it is much more difficult.
Q: How can a member successfully obtain a copy of their foreign grantor trust and confirmation letter from the IRS?
Answer:
The answer stated that the documents are believed to be placed in the platform.
Sometimes a member receives the EIN confirmation letter directly, while the tax filing team also receives a copy. Members who receive a posted copy have been uploading it to the platform.
However, members were specifically warned against calling the IRS themselves about their foreign grantor trust and tax redirection.
The explanation was that the tax filings were completed by a professional licensed tax preparer, rather than by the grantor. Calling the IRS and asking questions about the tax redirection could cause the file to be placed into manual review.
Q: When do the foreign grantor trusts and private trusts, the Asset Fortress, become fully operational once the initial paperwork and EIN are established?
Answer:
The trust is established with the trust indenture and EIN. The indenture was described as the rules of the trust.
However, it cannot become operational until the first foreign grantor trust receives the tax redirection.
The first foreign grantor trust receiving the tax redirection then distributes the funds to the Asset Fortress protocol or the ministry, depending on the member’s structure.
This can only happen once the banking has been established for the relevant ministry, private treasury or Asset Fortress protocol.
The sequence described was:
- Trust one — the tax filing trust.
- Tax redirection is received.
- Trust one distributes to trust two.
- Trust two is the private treasury.
Q: What mechanisms enable the same financial amount to be reclaimed in the subsequent year?
Answer:
The answer was that it is all about energy.
The explanation used the example of a fire: energy does not simply disappear. The energy is put onto the Monopoly board, brought back through the protocol and then put back onto the board again.
The explanation was that energy cannot be destroyed and can therefore be recycled.
SECTION 2 — BANKING OPERATIONS
Q: What is utilised for money if a 508C1A grantor trust is set up with recoupments outside of bankruptcy?
Answer:
The answer described the private treasury and the 508C1A ministry as different player pieces on the Monopoly board.
The foreign grantor trust or ministry operates in private, which was described as where creditors operate from.
The comparison used was a chessboard: the kings have different power from the pawns.
The explanation was that these structures allow the game to be played through a creditor entity rather than the debtor entity.
Q: What does OID mean in the context of filing a bank application?
Answer:
OID was described as Original Issue Discount and, in the explanation given, as a calculation of the value of the energy being released year by year on debt securities.
The answer stated that banks receive this energy gradually and that the foreign grantor trust is used to capture and redirect it.
The explanation also described the ledger within the foreign grantor trust or private ministry as a ledger rather than money.
Q: Is writing a check from a checking account considered or defined as a bank payment?
Answer:
Yes, because it is a negotiable instrument, although the answer qualified this.
A check itself is not a digital payment. However, when a check is drawn against a bank account, the ledger of that account goes down by the value of the check.
A banker’s draft is different because there is no originating account involved in the same way.
Therefore, a check drawn from a bank account qualifies, whereas a banker’s draft does not in the same way.
Q: Are past mortgages paid out in one lump sum or are they subject to the two-million-per-year cap?
Answer:
The answer was that all past energy credit debt that has been put on the Monopoly board qualifies.
The explanation included bank payments, the face value of mortgages, credit cards and loans as the main ways energy is put onto the Monopoly board.
The mortgage could have been granted yesterday or twenty-five years ago. The explanation was that the energy associated with it can still be redirected.
Q: Why would a heavily controlled digital money infrastructure allow an external entity like a foreign grantor trust to create and issue new coin?
Answer:
The answer was based on the distinction between the debtor and creditor positions on the Monopoly board.
The foreign grantor trust was described as a tool available to those who have remembered who they are and want to play Monopoly at an advanced level.
The explanation was that the system does not actively advertise foreign grantor trusts because, according to the speaker, most people are not looking for them.
Q: How does a potential change to the money system in 2026 compare to the historical monetary changes made in 1933?
Answer:
The answer was: “No comparison.”
The speaker described 1933 as a major tipping point in the monetary system, following the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
The changes being discussed for 2026, including the Genius Act, Clarity Act and stablecoins, were described as further digitisation of the existing system rather than a completely new system.
The answer rejected the idea that the IRS or Federal Reserve would simply disappear or that the BRICS system would replace the dollar system.
The dollar system was described as deeply integrated into the existing financial infrastructure.
SECTION 3 — PLATFORM, APP & TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Q: Why are user accounts occasionally blocked from the platform and how can administrative access be restored?
Answer:
The answer acknowledged that members have been experiencing difficulties accessing information and that this feedback needs to be addressed.
The application being developed is intended to make access easier.
Members will be able to use the application on a phone, tablet or computer and ask questions such as:
- What is happening with my process?
- What do I do now?
- What is my next step?
- Is there anything outstanding?
The application is intended to provide factual answers and make it easier for members to access information without having to remember platform passwords or which email account they used.
Q: Where can users find the current and previous webinar recordings?
Answer:
They are available on the ROS Media Platform.
The platform contains:
- The Monopoly Game Changer webinar archive
- Previous webinars
- Webinar Q&As
- Protocol information
- Testimonials
The platform is free to subscribe to.
The member’s personal process remains in the members’ area.
Q: Why have recent webinar recordings on the platform lacked presentation slides?
Answer:
The answer was that presentation slides have always been used.
The issue may be related to the different webinar platforms and devices being used.
The organisation previously used GoToWebinar, then temporarily used StreamYard and later moved to Zoho Webinar.
There may be browser or device-related issues, including situations where slides move forward automatically.
The issue needs to be investigated to determine whether the slides are working correctly across different browsers.
Q: Can the new app be installed on a Linux computer?
Answer:
The understanding given was that the application is a website that should work on different types of computers.
It was stated that it should work on Linux, and if it does not, the technical team should be able to make it work on Linux.
Q: Can the scan code for the app be provided again for users to download?
Answer:
The QR code is available in the members’ area under the ROS notification app.
The QR code can be scanned using a phone camera.
Once the camera recognises the QR code, a link appears and takes the user to the download page.
The app can be downloaded for iPhone/iPad and Android and can also be installed on a computer.
Q: What improvements have been made to the Avatar system to assist members facing urgent situations like home repossession?
Answer:
The Ian Clifford Avatar’s main function is to explain signature credit tax redirection, the Clifford Protocol and the Monopoly Game Changer.
It does not cover every subject discussed across all webinars.
For people facing urgent situations involving council tax, debt, mortgage foreclosure or court cases, the answer discussed using AI to examine the documents and identify weaknesses in the process.
The speaker described uploading relevant documents into an AI system and asking it to identify weaknesses or procedural issues.
The answer emphasised that the legal system operates through process and that AI can be used to examine those processes.
SECTION 4 — MEMBERSHIP & ORGANISATIONAL OPERATIONS
Q: Are there any active recruitments showing on the platform that are located outside of America?
Answer:
Yes.
The answer stated that many of the wages and tax transcripts received in the previous year came from outside America, with the majority described as being from outside the United States.
The explanation was that the system is US-based because the United States dollar is the world reserve currency and United States investment banks pay the relevant taxes.
Therefore, a member does not need to be physically located in America for the process described to work.
Q: Is it true that we have seventeen million dollars on the transcript?
Answer:
The answer was that the speaker did not know exactly what the banner on the platform referred to.
However, if the banner was put there by the tax and technology team, the understanding was that it represented the value of wages and tax transcripts received in 2026.
The speaker recalled that a similar banner had been used in 2025 and increased as wages and tax transcripts came in.
Q: Why have legacy members not received their funds while members of a Telegram group have been paid?
Answer:
The answer distinguished the ROS Telegram channel from a separate Discord channel.
The speaker said that Lisa Griffin had been introduced to the separate Discord group and that some people in that group had received tax redirections.
The answer stated that the people who received them were not receiving them because they were members of the ROS Telegram channel.
It was also stated that legacy members were not being deliberately placed behind new members and that everyone was receiving the same due care and attention.
The transcript then explained the history of the 2025 foreign grantor trusts, the subsequent destruction of those trusts and the later reinstatement and refiling process.
The speaker stated that the foreign grantor trusts were reinstated for members who stayed with ROS without an additional charge.
Q: How can members connect with each other to share detailed project plans?
Answer:
The answer was that ROS is not really enabling members to organise themselves into groups for this purpose.
If a member has a project they want to finance, they should submit the project details through the inquiry process.
The organisation is not trying to group existing members together to create projects.
The intended model is for someone to already have a project and the people who want to participate in that project, and then bring that project to ROS.
An example given was ENG-VIII, described as a project that already has an organisation and team but requires funding to reach mass manufacturing.
The explanation was that people who could benefit from the project could also potentially come into the group.
Q: How does the organisation’s focus involve physical land or virtual pseudo-land?
Answer:
The answer stated that a nation does not necessarily require land to be recognised as a nation, using the Sovereign Order of Malta as an example.
If land is wanted, the organisation would need to be recognised, acquire the land and obtain fee-simple title.
The speaker said that much land has already been registered to the state and used as collateral, while some land has not.
The land being sought would therefore be land that has not already been offered as collateral.
Q: Can humanitarians of the Muslim faith join the organisation?
Answer:
Yes, one hundred percent.
The answer used the analogy of supporting one football club while playing for another.
Being of the Muslim faith was not described as preventing someone from joining the organisation.
Q: Does the administration team need additional resources to handle backlogged email correspondence and attachments?
Answer:
The answer was that the organisation does not really operate through members sending large numbers of emails.
The organisation’s model is intended to be proactive, identifying where members are in their journey and reaching out to them.
The speaker explained that employing a large customer-service department to answer every individual question would not be an effective use of resources.
The application is intended to reduce the need for individual email correspondence by allowing members to ask the app what is happening with their process.
Q: Should consultation polls be restricted strictly to non-paid members for better guidance?
Answer:
The answer was no.
The polls are used for both paid and non-paid members.
The purpose of the polls is to understand who wants to move forward and whether they are in a position to do so.
The organisation can identify whether someone is a paid member or not from the poll data, so separate polls are not considered necessary.
SECTION 5 — LEADERSHIP & PERSONAL INQUIRIES
Q: At what point did Ian achieve self-awareness and a sense of oneness with all?
Answer:
The answer was that it did not happen in one single event.
Ian described it as a gradual process.
He recalled being seven years old and collecting discarded Sunday newspapers, taking them to a recycling centre for money and then giving the money to an elderly neighbour who was struggling financially.
When his mother asked why he was doing this, he said that the neighbour needed the money more than he did.
He said that, at seven, he already understood that there was light and dark and that this understanding came from the heart rather than the brain.
He described the later development of this understanding as a gradual process involving experiences throughout his life.
He also described receiving knowledge and insights when he was ready for them and said that he had experienced a significant increase in this in recent years.
Q: What are Ian’s perspectives regarding the potential collapse of the dollar and structural changes of the money system?
Answer:
The answer was that Ian has listened to academics, experts and other sources discussing the monetary system and has watched material such as the new Zeitgeist movie.
The answer described the dollar system as deeply integrated across international banking structures.
The speaker’s view was that the dollar system is not going anywhere anytime soon because it has taken decades to build and is integrated through institutions, central banks, clearing banks and investment banks.
The answer rejected the idea that the Federal Reserve or IRS would simply be removed or that another currency system would suddenly replace the dollar.
Q: Can live direct updates be provided by Ian instead of relying solely on the app and back-office platform?
Answer:
The answer was that the current Q&A itself is a live update because members ask questions and Ian answers them live.
The planned application is also intended to provide live updates on a member’s personal process.
The Q&As will continue because members continue to submit questions through the Saturday webinars.
The answer also explained that the app is intended to reduce the need for Ian to personally answer every individual member’s questions.
Q: Can you please give me the times of the Q&A on a Monday and Thursday in UK time for me to know when it is in New Zealand time?
Answer:
The usual intention is to start the Monday and Thursday Q&As at 11:00 AM UK time.
The speaker noted that this does not always happen exactly at 11:00 AM because the organisation operates dynamically.
The Q&As are recorded, so members do not have to attend live unless they want to ask questions live.
Members can also submit questions when registering for the Saturday webinar, even if they cannot attend live. Those questions are then downloaded and covered in the Monday Q&A.
The webinar and Q&A recordings are kept in the ROS Media Platform so members can watch them regardless of their time zone.