Q: I’d love to understand the broader context of what lies behind the fact that the banksters, as they call them, respect human energy?
Answer: The banks do not respect human energy, but they hold a total and utter reliance on it to operate. Accounting ledgers require a negotiable instrument to be deposited so the banks can create a matching liability on the other side of the balance sheet. Because the artificial birth certificate construct is dead and cannot make a deposit on its own, it requires its living soul agent to authorize transactions and transfer that life energy. Without this combination, the banking system cannot function.
Q: I’m just curious if it would help people understand the how of their signature being monetised if you could explain the technical process which apparently is explained in Federal Reserve Operating Circular Ten.
Answer: The process operates entirely on ex nihilo credit creation. Banks do not lend out existing customer deposits; they accept a deposit of a promise backed by your human energy and future labor. The customer’s signature triggers the deposit of a negotiable instrument, which transfers energy and establishes an interest obligation. The clearing bank matches this deposit with a liability (debt), bundles these debts into tranches, and sells them to investment banks. Investment banks then trade and hypothecate them as collateral for additional leverage. This mechanic is documented across works like The Creature from Jekyll Island, Bank of England research papers, and Modern Money Mechanics.
Q: Do insurance companies use the hypothecation of premiums in the same way by creating debt securities on the securities market or even via loan companies within their group structures.
Answer: No, insurance companies operate under a very different financial model. Unless an insurer specifically purchases a retail bank (such as AIG), they do not possess an ex nihilo credit creation license. Instead of creating money out of nothing, they manage accounting ledgers of debt by pooling premium promises to pay. Their entire model is based strictly on risk, probability, and mortality mathematics, which they hedge through backend reinsurance giants like Munich Re.
Q: If I correctly understand when the 1099 form OID is filed to the IRS. The IRS approves my foreign grantor 98 as the holder in due course of my mortgage and corrected the ledger. The mortgage is discharged. The bank nominee and the local bank who provided the mortgage must discharge the mortgage in the public system. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, that is correct. The investment bank operating as an indentured trustee holds your mortgage note pretending to be the creditor, but avoids filing an OID return to protect their false status. Filing a 1099-OID via a foreign grantor trust legally shifts the note to the trust, establishing it as the holder in due course. This corrects the accounting ledger, zeroing out the debt and entitling the trust to the taxes pre-paid by the investment bank to use your life energy. No physical money changes hands; it is entirely an accounting ledger correction.
Q: Does the IRS have to approve the foreign grantor trust before any taxes can be redirected?
Answer: Yes, in an administrative sense. When you submit an SS-4 application containing your trust indenture details, the IRS Cincinnati office evaluates the framework and must be fully satisfied with its structure before they will formally issue an EIN.
Q: In order for the 98 series to be tax exempt and protected under 508(c)(1)(a) does it work in tandem with a separate u.s ecclesiastical trust or is it just the 98 series trust? And by foreign grantor trust, does that mean foreign from the US corporation that can still be in the States?
Answer: They are two completely separate entities. A foreign grantor trust requires the grantor to be a foreign alien who does not disclose a US Social Security Number (SSN), operating under an attorney-in-fact model so it is not a US domestic trust. For a US resident setting up a private treasury, a 98 series trust carries a requirement to report its activities. Rerouting your private treasury into a tax-exempt 508(c)(1)(a) ministry completely eliminates this reporting friction and protects you from IRS audits. Deploying a 98 series trust for OID filing alongside a 508(c)(1)(a) ministry as a private treasury is the optimal combination for US residents.
Q: How do we use the 1099 OID to make purchases like tractors or land?
Answer: A 1099-OID is a tax return that redirects pre-paid withholding taxes; it is not a direct check, money order, or a method to buy physical goods at a dealership (unlike internet myths surrounding the 1099-A popularized by individuals like Chris Hauser). The correct process is to file the 1099-OID through your foreign grantor trust, recoup the taxes paid on your human energy, and then deploy those recovered funds within your private treasury asset fortress to buy the tractor or land. You can then recoup that exact asset expenditure back the following tax year.
Q: What do I need to do in order to shift from debtor agent status to creditor and general executor status?
Answer: You must execute the Envoy Protocol to halt the identity fraud of “holding out” (representing yourself) as the birth certificate construct, which strips your rights and forces you into the role of an executor de son tort (executor of all the wrongs). By executing a declaration using the maxim clausula rebus sic stantibus, you clean up your past record and establish that you are the living soul agent occupying the office of the general executor over the decedent estate. This prevents your filings from being contaminated by a presumed fraudulent standing.
Q: If we are the agent for the banker, the straw man, then why can’t we just pay all our straw man’s debts by issuing negotiable instruments, e.g. promissory notes? Do you know anyone who has had success with this?
Answer: Technically, this is impossible because utility, gas, and mortgage companies are not banks, and their corporate charters legally prohibit them from accepting promissory notes or bills of exchange as tender. Any perceived success on the internet where a bill “goes away” occurs simply because the provider decides to write off a minor debt rather than fund a costly legal war of attrition. The banking cartel holds an absolute monopoly on ex nihilo credit creation. The only functional remedy is to redirect your pre-paid taxes through the U.S. Treasury (the Bankruptcy Trustee) and discharge debts using standard promises to pay that banks actually accept.
Q: Does the office of the executor change when we do a depoll and change our name to given names and removing the surname? Are there pitfalls or problems arising from a deed poll or only benefits?
Answer: A deed poll simply renames the decedent estate; it does not alter its underlying corporate status, historical footprint, or your executor role. It functions exactly like changing a company’s name from ABC Limited to DEF Limited—the reference number, tracking, and liabilities remain identical and traceable back to inception. Ian executed a deed poll from Ian Clifford Stamp to Ian Clifford to draw a line in the sand against “Stamp” (the state-owned estate name), but the underlying corporate mechanics of the construct remain unchanged.
Q: How does someone from a country that is not US track back? I have been understanding that this is only through the IRS.
Answer: Virtually every commercial bank across the globe maintains a correspondent relationship with a major US financial institution to gain access to the Federal Reserve window. The international banking model operates as a strict pyramid with the IMF at the top. For example, isolated banks in places like North Cyprus clear through correspondent banks in Turkey, which is fully integrated into the IMF system. Because your local signature credit is bundled and traded up to the Federal Reserve window, it automatically tracks back directly into the US system.
Q: When calculating USD value of signature credit from other currencies, what exchange rate do we use? Do we use present exchange rate or historical exchange rate at time of the bank transactions?
Answer: You must use the present/current exchange rate. While the US Department of the Treasury publishes annual historical rates, you convert your total aggregated credit balance directly into the current value of the US dollar rather than calculating individual historical exchange rates for every past year.
Q: If you have a limited company or an LLC paying taxes, can you recover them as well? Or is this only for individuals?
Answer: Yes, corporate business accounts and personal accounts are both tracked as artificial corporate constructs operating on the Monopoly board. When you sign documents as an officer of an LLC, the signature currency still originates from your living soul energy. If that LLC executes tax payments or bank transfers, those represent a valid outward flow of energy that can be recovered through our tax redirection protocols.
Q: How does it work for joint accounts? Can someone borrow or can one borrower, reclaim the full amount?
Answer: Because joint bank accounts, loans, and mortgages carry joint and several liability, they legally function exactly like a standard business partnership. A single borrower holds the full right to reclaim the entire amount of the signature credit taxes, but both account holders are legally prohibited from simultaneously double-claiming or recovering against the exact same instrument.
Q: If some bank accounts are in two names due to working with another guy when working together as builders, no partnership agreement ever formed, can this be considered a non-business account i.e personal account for signature credit purposes
Answer: This structure typically operates either as a standard sole trader account with two names or a baseline un-contracted partnership account. Either individual holder maintains the structural right to use the account for signature credit tax redirection, but both parties cannot execute a claim against it simultaneously.
Q: What if a person has say eight or ten million to recoup if you can claim back two million a year do you set up more trust accounts
Answer: No, the $2 million safe harbor limit is strictly capped per grantor, not per trust account. Attempting to open multiple separate trusts under one grantor will not bypass this automated processing threshold. If you hold $8 million in lifetime credit, you must absorb it over the next four years by filing for $2 million per calendar year. (Married couples can effectively combine limits to process up to $4 million total per year by filing as two separate grantors through distinct grantor trusts).